Vaccination against sweet itch: what the studies actually measured
In the placebo-controlled trial 47 per cent of vaccinated horses halved their lesion score, 13 per cent on placebo. Where the 88 per cent figure comes from.
Scientific reviewPosition not yet filled, stated openly.
10 min readLast substantive review
Open access
Executive summary
An active vaccination against interleukin 5, one of the body's own signalling molecules, has been tested against sweet itch in horses. In the placebo-controlled trial in 34 Icelandic horses, 47 per cent of the vaccinated animals halved their lesion score, against 13 per cent on placebo. The frequently quoted figure of nearly nine horses in ten comes instead from the second season, which no longer had a placebo group. Skin lesions were measured, not itch.
19primary sources
32 %of them level 1 to 2
4species studied
2014–2026publication years
Key points
In the randomised, placebo-controlled trial in 34 Icelandic horses, 47 per cent of the vaccinated animals halved their lesion score and 21 per cent improved by three quarters, against 13 and 0 per cent on the dummy preparation.
The widely repeated figure of 88 per cent comes from the second season, in which every participating horse was vaccinated: there was neither a concurrent placebo group nor blinding.
Skin lesions were what was measured. A broadly tested scoring system for this disease has existed only since 2026, validated in 44 privately kept horses in Switzerland.
17 of the 19 vaccinated horses formed antibodies against their own interleukin and two did not respond; beyond the third vaccination season, six horses have been followed so far.
A second vaccine against a different signalling molecule and a desensitisation using genetically produced allergens reached similar proportions in equally small groups.
Sweet itch: named more often than measured
Sweet itch is an allergic reaction to components in the saliva of biting midges of the genus Culicoides. A review from 2023 records two points that frame everything else: there is still no curative treatment, and the care of affected horses remains lifelong and costly. The frequency named there, up to 60 per cent, is a maximum from particularly exposed regions and not a general figure.
Across a broad population the picture differs. A survey of 3,409 Belgian warmblood horses found a frequency of 10 per cent over the whole lifetime and of 6.2 per cent at the time of the survey, with the heritability of susceptibility estimated as high. The diagnosis came from the keepers themselves, however, without veterinary confirmation: a questionnaire frequency is not the same as one recorded in the clinic.
Is sweet itch therefore purely a matter of inheritance?
No, in an observational study the timing of the first encounter with the midge weighed more heavily. Four groups from the same environment were followed for at least nine years: among the parent animals first exposed as adults, 62.5 per cent fell ill, against 21.4 per cent of the full siblings exposed while young and none of the animals exposed from birth.
Sensitisation itself also takes time. In a cohort of 16 Icelandic horses imported into North America, no animal showed signs in the first summer; in the second summer there were 9 of 16. Judging a treatment over a single season may therefore mean measuring the natural course of sensitisation as well.
What this vaccine targets
In allergic skin inflammation in the horse, eosinophil granulocytes accumulate in the skin. Their growth and their survival depend strongly on one signalling molecule, interleukin 5. The vaccine that was tested is therefore not directed against a pathogen but against this signal produced by the body itself: the horse forms antibodies against its own signalling molecule and thereby reduces the number of these cells.
Technically, a piece of the equine interleukin is attached to a virus-like particle of cucumber mosaic virus, which additionally carries an element of tetanus toxoid. No adjuvant is added. This construction is the real trick, because the immune system does not normally attack the body's own substances.
How can a body be vaccinated against one of its own signalling molecules?
Through the carrier. A laboratory paper from 2020 showed that the T cells of vaccinated horses react to the virus-like particle and not to the interleukin itself. Antibody levels are reversible, and the interleukin present in the body is not on its own enough to restart antibody production. It is precisely on this that the authors base their assessment of tolerability.
The original trial: 34 Icelandic horses, one season
Every report about this vaccine rests on a single efficacy trial, published in 2018 in an allergy journal. 34 Icelandic horses with sweet itch were allocated to two groups, 19 received the vaccine and 15 a dummy preparation. An independent review from 2023 describes the procedure as randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled, with monthly vaccination over three months and a booster two months later.
The result was clear but incomplete. 47 per cent of the vaccinated horses halved their lesion score and 21 per cent improved by three quarters. On the dummy preparation the figures were 13 per cent and 0 per cent. 17 of the 19 vaccinated horses formed measurable antibodies against their own interleukin at all, two showed no immunological response, and the clinical improvement depended on a minimum level of those antibodies.
The authors describe their result as the first successful immunotherapy against a chronic disease of the horse and as a step towards a comparable vaccine for humans. Cure is nowhere mentioned. The trial ran in a single breed, over a single season, with a lesion score as its yardstick, and the company developing the product took part in it.
Where the figure of nearly nine in ten comes from
The most widely passed on figure does not come from this trial but from the follow-up paper on the second season. 30 Icelandic horses were analysed there: 13 animals that had received the dummy preparation the year before and were now vaccinated for the first time, and 17 animals in their second vaccination year, which received a single booster in March.
In the first group 69 per cent halved their lesion score, in the second 88 per cent. An improvement by three quarters was reached by 31 and 47 per cent respectively. Out of those 88 per cent, retelling has produced “nearly nine horses in ten”.
Proportion of horses reaching a halving, or an improvement by three quarters, of the lesion score, by vaccination year and by whether a comparison group existed.
Analysis
Halving of the score
Improvement by three quarters
Concurrent control group
First season, vaccinated (19 horses)
47 per cent
21 per cent
yes, 15 horses on the dummy preparation
First season, dummy preparation (15 horses)
13 per cent
0 per cent
not applicable
Second season, vaccinated for the first time (13 horses)
69 per cent
31 per cent
no
Second season, second vaccination year (17 horses)
88 per cent
47 per cent
no
What matters is what this second season lacked. Every horse received the vaccine, and there was no longer a concurrent placebo group. The most quoted figure therefore rests on no controlled comparison at all, and only the first year was blinded. The authors accordingly stay cautious: an annual vaccination could be a long-term solution.
The skin was measured, not the itch
The yardstick in all these trials is a points system for skin lesions: scaling, hair loss, rubbing marks, thickening, distributed across body regions. Only in 2026 was such a system tested comprehensively for sweet itch, in 44 privately kept horses in Switzerland and by six trained assessors. Specialists call it the first broadly validated score for this disease. Conversely, that means the older trials, the vaccine trial among them, worked with scales that had not undergone this testing.
The same paper contains a second, rarely quoted finding. The trained assessors agreed very closely with one another and with themselves. The keepers' visual judgement, by contrast, matched the tested clinical score only moderately, although the keepers agreed strongly among themselves. Broad consensus among keepers therefore does not replace a clinical measurement.
Does better skin also mean less itching?
Not necessarily. In a randomised trial of an omega-3 cream, the skin lesions on the treated half of the body improved over the first four weeks compared with the untreated half, while the itch values did not change. After four weeks both sides were treated, so the later comparison was no longer controlled.
A randomised crossover trial of an essential oil spray in 20 horses shows how far perception and tissue can diverge. The values recorded by the veterinary surgeons did improve there against the dummy preparation, itch included. The keepers, however, reported complete disappearance of the complaints in 85 per cent of the horses, while of four tissue samples examined only one was entirely unremarkable.
Why untreated groups improve as well
The cleanest evidence for this comes from a double-blind, randomised trial of desensitisation with commercially available extracts. 20 horses, ten against ten, one year of follow-up, a check every four months: at no point did the clinical values differ. Both groups nevertheless improved to a similar degree, which the specialists attribute to the repellent that both groups received weekly.
That a control arm improves therefore has solid reasons: an accompanying measure that everyone receives, a variable midge year, a sensitisation that is not yet complete, and the increased attention a study horse receives in any case.
Two papers from other species show how strongly the frame of a study shifts the judgement. An analysis of 64 randomised trials in atopic dermatitis in humans found the response to the dummy treatment higher the longer the study ran, the more accompanying treatments were permitted and the fewer study arms there were; absence of blinding raised the response particularly at the level of skin lesions. In ageing dogs, the animals in the placebo arm were rated as improved by their keepers over six months, while dogs that were merely observed were rated as worse; the tests carried out on site changed in neither group.
Safety, duration and the open points
A separate paper deals with tolerability. It followed 34 vaccinated Icelandic horses, spread across the first to the fifth vaccination year, together with affected horses on the dummy preparation and healthy unvaccinated animals. Kidney and liver values as well as the blood count were observed over time. The T cells of the vaccinated horses reacted strongly to the carrier and not at all to the equine interleukin itself.
The numbers behind the long-term observation are small, however. Beyond the third season, six horses were followed, four in the fourth and two in the fifth vaccination year. Surveillance after market launch is not mentioned in the papers analysed here, nor is an authorisation status or a price. This literature says nothing about them.
A laboratory paper from 2024 adds a point about timing. The number of eosinophil cells falls in the first vaccination year already, yet those that remain initially keep an inflammatory appearance. Only after two years does the population shift to a resting state of the kind healthy horses show. Cellular normalisation therefore takes two seasons, and this paper too comes from the developer's group.
Other routes, similar figures
The same working group has tested a second vaccine, directed against interleukin 31, the signalling molecule of itch. In a controlled trial in 18 horses the clinical values fell against the untreated previous season and against the horses on the dummy preparation. Improvement in this type of protocol is therefore not tied to interleukin 5.
A completely different approach reaches proportions that are at least as high. With desensitisation using nine genetically produced midge allergens, 67 per cent of the treated horses against 25 per cent of the sham-treated horses halved their score in the first year, and 89 against 14 per cent in the second. Behind these proportions stand single-digit numbers: six of nine, two of eight, eight of nine, one of seven. Allocation was moreover not random but balanced by stable, origin, age and sex; the keepers and the assessing clinic were blinded.
For placing all this in context, that means only one thing at first: several very different interventions produce similar-looking success rates in small groups. A direct comparison between them has never been carried out, and until recently no single tested scoring system was even available for the purpose.
What follows from this for humans
Blockade of interleukin 5 has long been tested in humans on a large scale, though in a different way. A Cochrane review brings together 17 randomised studies with around 7,600 participants with severe eosinophilic asthma: the rate of worsening episodes falls roughly by half. The gains in quality of life and lung function, by contrast, mostly stay below the threshold a patient would notice at all.
These studies use ready-made antibodies, given at regular intervals, and not an active vaccination that lets the body produce them itself. A vaccine of this construction has not yet been tested in humans. What exists is a perspective article from the same group, published in 2018, proposing such a vaccine against asthma: a proposal, not a programme.
A paper from 2025 additionally showed that vaccination against interleukin 5 lowers allergen-specific class E antibodies, in mouse and horse, and dampens the signalling molecules in diseased skin. The only clinically measured endpoint in that paper, swelling of the ear, was recorded in the mouse alone. The preventive use hinted at there is expressly framed as a hypothesis and has never been tested.
What was compared with what in the sweet itch trials
Original analysis
For every controlled equine study found in this research, the design, the number of horses and the comparison group actually used were taken from the original paper; the last column names the conclusion that the design in question precisely does not support.
Approach
Best design found
Horses in the trial
What it was compared with
What this design does not support
Vaccination against interleukin 5, first season
Randomised, double-blind, against a dummy preparation
34 (19 against 15)
Concurrent placebo group in the same season
That the improvement lasts beyond that one season
Vaccination against interleukin 5, second season
Half-crossover follow-up without a control arm
30 (13 vaccinated for the first time, 17 with a booster)
The same horses' own previous season
That the 88 per cent is due to the vaccination
Vaccination against interleukin 31
Controlled trial, randomisation not reported
18
Previous season and horses on a dummy preparation
That the effect depends on one particular signalling molecule
Desensitisation with whole-body extracts
Randomised, double-blind, against a dummy preparation
20 (10 against 10)
Concurrent placebo group over one year
That the improvement in both groups came from the extract
Desensitisation with recombinant midge allergens
Double-blind, allocation not random but balanced
17 (9 against 8, then 9 against 7)
Concurrent sham treatment over two seasons
That the groups were comparable in unknown features too
Essential oil spray
Randomised crossover trial, double-blind, 28 days per phase
20
Dummy preparation in the other phase
That the 85 per cent reported by keepers is reflected in the tissue
Cream with omega-3 fatty acids
Randomised half-body comparison, single-blind
28 enrolled, 21 completed
The untreated half of the body, day 0 to day 28
That the itch improves along with it
Limitations and uncertainty
The only randomised, placebo-controlled efficacy trial of this vaccination covers 34 horses of a single breed over a single season. All further effect figures come from follow-up observations without a concurrent control group.
Of the 19 sources analysed here, only six reach the level of systematic review, meta-analysis or randomised trial, and two of those concern humans. The editorial requirement of at least half cannot currently be met in this field.
Almost all work on the vaccination comes from the developer's research group or from studies with its participation. No independent replication in a different population was found in this research.
The efficacy trials used lesion scores that were not broadly validated at the time they were carried out. Results from different studies can therefore be set side by side only to a limited extent.
On authorisation status, availability, cost and surveillance after market launch, the publications analysed contain no information. This text can say nothing about them.
The safety data beyond the third vaccination season rest on six horses, and the safety paper relies on laboratory values and cell features, not on clinical endpoints.
Open questions
Can the observed effect be reproduced outside Icelandic horses and outside the developer's group?
How does the itch behave under vaccination when it is measured separately from the lesion score and with a tested instrument?
How long does a benefit last, and what happens if the annual booster is not given?
Would vaccination before the first sensitisation be more effective than vaccination in a horse that is already affected, as the observations on early exposure suggest?
Frequently asked questions
Is there now a vaccine against sweet itch that I can have given to my horse?
This question cannot be answered from the published evidence, because the scientific papers contain no information on authorisation, availability or price. What is documented is the following: a vaccine against interleukin 5, one of the body's own signalling molecules, was tested in 2018 in a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in 34 Icelandic horses, with partial improvement in just under half of the vaccinated animals. Whether and in what form it may be used in Switzerland is for the attending veterinary practice to clarify, not for an article. This text describes what was measured and makes no recommendation.
Is it true that nearly nine horses in ten respond to the vaccination?
The figure exists, but it comes from a season without a control group. In the second vaccination season, 88 per cent of 17 horses that received a single booster halved their lesion score. In that season every participating horse was given the vaccine, and there was neither a concurrent placebo group nor blinding. The more robust value comes from the first year: 47 per cent of the vaccinated horses against 13 per cent of the sham-treated ones. Both figures are correctly reported, they simply do not carry equally far.
Will my horse be cured by the vaccination?
No, and the studies do not claim so either. What was measured is a partial improvement in skin lesions, not removal of the allergy. A review from 2023 states expressly that there is no curative treatment for sweet itch and that care remains lifelong. In the second season the horses received a booster, and antibody levels recede if no further vaccination follows. Specialists therefore speak of a possible long-term treatment, not of a cure.
Why is itch barely mentioned in these studies?
Because almost every trial counts skin lesions rather than rubbing behaviour. That is not a detail: in a randomised trial of an omega-3 cream, the appearance of the skin improved on the treated half of the body, while the itch values did not change. Only in 2026 was a scoring system for this disease tested broadly, in 44 privately kept horses in Switzerland. The same paper found that the keepers' visual judgement matches the clinical score only moderately, although keepers agree very strongly among themselves.
My horse was much better last summer without my changing anything. How does that happen?
That is common and well documented. In a randomised trial of desensitisation, treated and sham-treated horses improved to a similar degree, which the specialists attribute to the repellent that both groups received weekly. Added to this are midge activity, which varies from year to year, and the fact that sensitisation takes time: in a cohort of 16 imported Icelandic horses none fell ill in the first summer and nine did in the second. A before-and-after comparison over a single season therefore says little.
Is the vaccination safe?
The available data do not argue against tolerability, but they are thin. A separate paper followed 34 vaccinated Icelandic horses across up to five vaccination years and observed kidney and liver values as well as the blood count. The T cells reacted to the carrier and not to the body's own signalling molecule, and antibody levels recede. Beyond the third season, however, only six horses were followed, the endpoints were laboratory values rather than clinical events, and surveillance after market launch is nowhere mentioned.
Are there alternatives that have been studied equally well?
Studied yes, equally well supported no. Desensitisation with nine genetically produced midge allergens reached 89 per cent against 14 per cent on sham treatment in the second year in 17 horses, though without random allocation and with single-digit groups. An older desensitisation with commercially available whole-body extracts showed no difference from sham treatment in a randomised trial. An essential oil spray improved the values recorded by veterinary surgeons in a crossover trial in 20 horses. A direct comparison between these approaches is missing.
Sources
Fettelschoss-Gabriel A, Fettelschoss V, Thoms F, Giese C. Treating insect-bite hypersensitivity in horses with active vaccination against IL-5.. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2018 (Randomised trial | Horse)DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.01.041 In 34 Icelandic horses (19 vaccinated, 15 on a dummy preparation) 47 per cent of the vaccinated animals halved and 21 per cent improved by three quarters their lesion score, against 13 and 0 per cent on placebo, with 17 of the 19 vaccinated horses forming antibodies and improvement depending on a minimum level: a first successful but partial immunotherapy, not a cure.
Fettelschoss-Gabriel A, Fettelschoss V, Olomski F, Birkmann K. Active vaccination against interleukin-5 as long-term treatment for insect-bite hypersensitivity in horses.. Allergy, 2019 (Controlled trial | Horse)DOI 10.1111/all.13659 In the second season all 30 horses received the vaccine, so that no concurrent placebo group remained; 69 per cent of the 13 horses vaccinated for the first time and 88 per cent of the 17 boosted horses halved their lesion score, from which the authors infer a possible annual long-term treatment.
Jonsdottir S, Fettelschoss V, Olomski F, Talker SC. Safety Profile of a Virus-Like Particle-Based Vaccine Targeting Self-Protein Interleukin-5 in Horses.. Vaccines, 2020 (Laboratory study | Multiple species)DOI 10.3390/vaccines8020213 The T cell response of vaccinated horses is directed against the viral carrier and not against the body's own interleukin, antibody levels are reversible, and the mere presence of the animal's own signalling molecule does not restart antibody production; beyond the third vaccination season, six horses were followed.
Schwarz E, Jebbawi F, Keller G, Rhiner T. Phenotypic Shift of an Inflammatory Eosinophil Subset into a Steady-State Resident Phenotype after 2 Years of Vaccination against IL-5 in Equine Insect Bite Hypersensitivity.. Veterinary Sciences, 2024 (Laboratory study | Horse)DOI 10.3390/vetsci11100476 The number of eosinophil cells falls in the first vaccination year already, but only after two vaccination years does the remaining population shift from an inflammatory to a resting appearance of the kind healthy horses show.
Jebbawi F, Olomski F, Inversini V, Keller G. Anti-IL-5 Vaccination Dampens Allergen-Specific IgE Levels and Modulates IL-4 and IL-5 Th2 Cytokines in Skin Allergy of Mice and Horses.. Allergy, 2025 (Laboratory study | Multiple species)DOI 10.1111/all.70020 In mouse and horse the vaccination lowers allergen-specific class E antibodies and dampens several signalling molecules in diseased skin; the only clinically measured endpoint was recorded in the mouse alone, and preventive use is expressly framed only as a hypothesis.
Olomski F, Fettelschoss V, Jonsdottir S, Birkmann K. Interleukin 31 in insect bite hypersensitivity-Alleviating clinical symptoms by active vaccination against itch.. Allergy, 2020 (Controlled trial | Horse)DOI 10.1111/all.14145 A second vaccine, directed against the itch signalling molecule interleukin 31, lowered the clinical values in 18 horses against the untreated previous season and against horses on a dummy preparation: improvement in this type of protocol is not confined to interleukin 5.
Lam J, Eckert A, Rhiner T, Waldern N. Validation of an improved insect bite hypersensitivity severity score for allergic equine insect bite hypersensitivity in horses.. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 2026 (Cross-sectional study | Horse)DOI 10.1093/jvimsj/aalag132 In 44 privately kept horses in Switzerland and with six trained assessors, the first broadly validated severity score for this disease was tested; the keepers' visual judgement matched the clinical score only moderately, while the keepers agreed strongly among themselves.
Ginel PJ, Hernández E, Lucena R, Blanco B. Allergen-specific immunotherapy in horses with insect bite hypersensitivity: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.. Veterinary Dermatology, 2014 (Randomised trial | Horse)DOI 10.1111/vde.12092 In 20 horses over one year the clinical values never differed between desensitisation and sham treatment; both groups improved to a similar degree, which the authors attribute to the repellent applied weekly in both groups.
Graner A, Mueller RS, Geisler J, Bogenstätter D. Allergen immunotherapy using recombinant Culicoides allergens improves clinical signs of equine insect bite hypersensitivity.. Frontiers in Allergy, 2024 (Controlled trial | Horse)DOI 10.3389/falgy.2024.1467245 With nine recombinant midge allergens, 67 per cent of the treated horses against 25 per cent of the sham-treated horses in the first year, and 89 against 14 per cent in the second, halved their score; allocation was not random but balanced, and the groups comprised single-digit numbers.
Cox A, Wood K, Coleman G, Stewart AJ. Essential oil spray reduces clinical signs of insect bite hypersensitivity in horses.. Australian Veterinary Journal, 2020 (Randomised trial | Horse)DOI 10.1111/avj.12963 In a blinded crossover trial in 20 horses all four values recorded by the veterinary surgeons, itch included, improved against baseline and against the dummy preparation, while the keepers reported complete disappearance in 85 per cent and only one of four tissue samples was entirely unremarkable.
Huhmann R, Mueller RS. A cream containing omega-3-fatty acids, humectants and emollients as an aid in the treatment of equine Culicoides hypersensitivity.. Veterinary Dermatology, 2019 (Randomised trial | Horse)DOI 10.1111/vde.12728 In the half-body comparison over the first four weeks the skin lesions on the treated side improved against the untreated side, while itch and coat quality did not change meaningfully; from day 28 both sides were treated, so that the later comparison was no longer controlled.
Cox A, Stewart AJ. Insect Bite Hypersensitivity in Horses: Causes, Diagnosis, Scoring and New Therapies.. Animals, 2023 (Other | Horse)DOI 10.3390/ani13152514 Narrative review without a systematic search: there is no curative treatment, care remains lifelong and costly, the scoring systems were still undergoing validation, and the 2018 trial is described here independently as randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled.
Simonin EM, Torsteinsdóttir S, Svansson V, Björnsdóttir S. Early allergen introduction overrides allergy predisposition in offspring of horses with Culicoides hypersensitivity.. Frontiers in Immunology, 2025 (Cohort study | Horse)DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1654693 In four groups from the same environment followed for at least nine years, 62.5 per cent of the parent animals first exposed as adults fell ill, against 21.4 per cent of the full siblings exposed while young and none of the animals exposed from birth: the timing of first exposure weighed more heavily than predisposition.
Raza F, Ivanek R, Freer H, Reiche D. Cul o 2 specific IgG3/5 antibodies predicted Culicoides hypersensitivity in a group imported Icelandic horses.. BMC Veterinary Research, 2020 (Cohort study | Horse)DOI 10.1186/s12917-020-02499-w Of 16 imported Icelandic horses none fell ill in the first summer and 9 did in the second, so that sensitisation takes at least one season; individual antibody classes were already raised before the signs appeared.
Peeters LM, Janssens S, Brebels M, Buys N. Genetic parameters and estimated breeding values of insect bite hypersensitivity in Belgian Warmblood horses.. The Veterinary Journal, 2015 (Cross-sectional study | Horse)DOI 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.08.012 In a survey of 3,409 sport horses the frequency was 10 per cent over the lifetime and 6.2 per cent at the time of the survey, clearly below the often quoted maximum of 60 per cent, with the heritability of susceptibility estimated as high.
Simon KE, Russell K, Mondino A, Yang CC. Quantifying placebo and trial participation effects on cognitive outcome measures in aging dogs.. GeroScience, 2025 (Other | Other animal species)DOI 10.1007/s11357-025-01822-3 Dogs in the placebo arm were rated as improved by their keepers over six months, whereas dogs that were merely observed were rated as worse, while the tests carried out on site did not change: the study frame itself influences the keepers' judgement.
Lee HH, Patel KR, Rastogi S, Singam V. Placebo responses in randomized controlled trials for systemic therapy in atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2020 (Meta-analysis | Human)DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.05.102 Across 64 randomised studies the response to sham treatment rose with a study duration of three months or more, with permitted accompanying treatments and with fewer study arms, and absence of blinding raised the response particularly at the level of skin lesions.
Farne HA, Wilson A, Milan S, Banchoff E. Anti-IL-5 therapies for asthma.. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2022 (Systematic review | Human)DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD010834.pub4 Across 17 studies with around 7,600 participants with severe eosinophilic asthma the rate of worsening episodes falls roughly by half under passive blockade of interleukin 5, while the gains in quality of life and lung function mostly stay below the clinically noticeable threshold.
Bachmann MF, El-Turabi A, Fettelschoss-Gabriel A, Vogel M. The Prospects of an Active Vaccine Against Asthma Targeting IL-5.. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018 (Other | Multiple species)DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02522 Perspective article from the same developer group without data of its own: it proposes developing an analogous vaccine against asthma in humans, draws on mouse and horse data and documents no existing clinical programme.
ForschungPferd (2026). Vaccination against sweet itch: what the studies actually measured. ForschungPferd, English. https://forschungpferd.ch/en/equine-health/sweet-itch-vaccine-evidence/