Glossary
Level of evidence.
Direct answer
The level of evidence ranks scientific findings by how well the underlying study design rules out chance and systematic error. A single observation sits low, a randomised controlled trial sits high, and a careful systematic review sits higher still. The level judges how a study was built, not whether its result is true.
A high level does not mean a result is correct: it means the design excludes known sources of error more effectively. A poorly conducted randomised trial can be weaker than a rigorous observational study. Reading an evidence scale therefore means checking how the work was carried out, not only the label attached to it.
In equine medicine the available evidence sits lower on average than in human medicine: group sizes are small, trials are expensive, and comparison arms are delicate when the animals are valuable. Many recommendations rest on case series or on transfer from other species. That is no reason for distrust, but every reason to state the level openly.
Related content
- Autumn ACTH in the horse: what a seasonal reference range really tells you
- Sycamore and atypical myopathy: why not every horse on the same pasture falls ill
- Strangles in horses: what is known about silent carriers and the duration of shedding
- Fructan in the grass, insulin in the horse: what laminitis research has actually measured
- Soaking hay: why no soaking time guarantees a result on sugar
- Kissing spines on radiographs: what a finding says about pain and what it does not predict
- Crib-biting and weaving: what the evidence says about stereotypies in horses
- A faecal egg count with nothing found: what a negative result does not rule out
Randomised controlled trialSystematic reviewExternal validity
The evidence letter
Once a month: new syntheses, checked studies, and what has changed in the state of the evidence.