Glossary
Control group.
Direct answer
A control group does not receive the treatment under test but instead nothing, a dummy treatment or the usual care. It provides the yardstick for how the condition would have developed without the new intervention. Without that comparison, improvement cannot be separated from natural course and from the effects of attention.
Many complaints fluctuate on their own and improve after a low point. Treating exactly at the low point makes any measure look effective. This regression towards the mean is what makes a control group indispensable: it passes through the same time, the same observation and the same expectation, minus the active component.
In horses an untreated control group is harder to justify than in people, because the owner pays for taking part and will not leave a valuable animal without care. Comparisons are therefore often made against standard practice, or crossover designs are used in which every animal passes through both conditions in turn.
Related content
- Why a broken leg ends differently in a horse than in a person
- Sycamore and atypical myopathy: why not every horse on the same pasture falls ill
- Fructan in the grass, insulin in the horse: what laminitis research has actually measured
- Kissing spines on radiographs: what a finding says about pain and what it does not predict
- Crib-biting and weaving: what the evidence says about stereotypies in horses
- Free faecal water in horses: which causes have been studied and which have not held up
- Gastric ulcers in the horse: how well behavioural signs predict the gastroscopy result
- Pastern dermatitis in horses: which causes are established and which are not
Randomised controlled trialPlaceboBlinding (single and double)
The evidence letter
Once a month: new syntheses, checked studies, and what has changed in the state of the evidence.